CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) RNASampler(20)
MCC 0.730 > 0.692
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.705 ± 0.076 < 0.707 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.575 < 0.621
Positive Predictive Value 0.930 > 0.776
Total TP 334 < 361
Total TN 68170 > 68064
Total FP 48 < 165
Total FP CONTRA 21 < 42
Total FP INCONS 4 < 62
Total FP COMP 23 < 61
Total FN 247 > 220
P-value 5.06544643719e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and RNASampler(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and RNASampler(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and RNASampler(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 334
Total TN 68170
Total FP 48
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 4
Total FP COMP 23
Total FN 247
Total Scores
MCC 0.730
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.705 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.575
Positive Predictive Value 0.930
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.52 0.27 1.00 6 1102 0 0 0 0 16
3GX2_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 24 1425 1 0 0 1 4
3IVN_B 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 882 2 2 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.43 0.77 41 25483 17 12 0 5 54
3J20_0 0.53 0.29 1.00 6 1213 0 0 0 0 15
3J3D_C 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 962 0 0 0 0 13
3J3E_8 0.39 0.20 0.75 3 2738 1 1 0 0 12
3J3F_8 0.62 0.47 0.82 9 4750 4 2 0 2 10
3JYV_7 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 1106 1 0 0 1 15
3LA5_A 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 933 1 1 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.79 0.65 0.96 24 2253 5 0 1 4 13
3O58_3 0.68 0.50 0.92 11 4752 2 1 0 1 11
3PDR_A 0.93 0.88 0.98 44 4795 3 0 1 2 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
3ZEX_C 0.56 0.34 0.91 10 5363 3 1 0 2 19
4A1C_2 0.60 0.40 0.89 8 4507 3 1 0 2 12
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 464 0 0 0 0 7
4ENC_A 0.73 0.53 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 7
4FRG_B 0.81 0.71 0.94 17 1184 2 0 1 1 7

^top



Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 361
Total TN 68064
Total FP 165
Total FP CONTRA 42
Total FP INCONS 62
Total FP COMP 61
Total FN 220
Total Scores
MCC 0.692
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.707 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.621
Positive Predictive Value 0.776
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3GX2_A 0.88 0.79 1.00 22 1427 1 0 0 1 6
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.41 0.65 39 25476 26 15 6 5 56
3J20_0 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 1198 3 1 1 1 2
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 0.19 0.20 0.19 3 2726 21 5 8 8 12
3J3F_8 0.43 0.47 0.39 9 4738 20 6 8 6 10
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 21 2257 5 0 0 5 16
3O58_3 0.51 0.50 0.52 11 4743 19 5 5 9 11
3PDR_A 0.84 0.76 0.93 38 4799 5 1 2 2 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.81 0.69 0.95 20 1512 1 0 1 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.31 0.39 9 5351 21 3 11 7 20
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 30 3 13 14 15
4AOB_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1417 4 0 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 465 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.64 0.54 0.76 13 1185 4 0 4 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.