Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of CentroidFold
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of PETfold_2.0(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & PETfold_2.0(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
CentroidFold |
|
PETfold_2.0(seed) |
|---|
| MCC |
0.967 |
>
|
0.831 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.967
±
|
>
|
0.831
±
|
| Sensitivity |
0.968 |
>
|
0.806 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.968 |
>
|
0.862 |
| Total TP |
30 |
>
|
25 |
| Total TN |
1647 |
<
|
1649 |
| Total FP |
1 |
<
|
5 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
1 |
<
|
2 |
| Total FP INCONS |
0 |
<
|
2 |
| Total FP COMP |
0 |
<
|
1 |
| Total FN |
1 |
<
|
6 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and PETfold_2.0(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for CentroidFold
and PETfold_2.0(seed)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and PETfold_2.0(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for CentroidFold
and PETfold_2.0(seed)).
Performance of CentroidFold
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
30 |
| Total TN |
1647 |
| Total FP |
1 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
1 |
| Total FP INCONS |
0 |
| Total FP COMP |
0 |
| Total FN |
1 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.967 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.967
±
|
| Sensitivity |
0.968 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.968 |
| Nr of predictions |
1 |
Performance of PETfold_2.0(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_2.0(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
25 |
| Total TN |
1649 |
| Total FP |
5 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
2 |
| Total FP INCONS |
2 |
| Total FP COMP |
1 |
| Total FN |
6 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.831 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.831
±
|
| Sensitivity |
0.806 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.862 |
| Nr of predictions |
1 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
| 
