CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST Afold
MCC 0.592 > 0.494
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.508 ± 0.328 > 0.503 ± 0.193
Sensitivity 0.528 > 0.523
Positive Predictive Value 0.674 > 0.479
Total TP 93 > 92
Total TN 13417 > 13363
Total FP 66 < 132
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 25
Total FP INCONS 33 < 75
Total FP COMP 21 < 32
Total FN 83 < 84
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Afold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Afold).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 93
Total TN 13417
Total FP 66
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 83
Total Scores
MCC 0.592
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.508 ± 0.328
Sensitivity 0.528
Positive Predictive Value 0.674
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
2M58_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 539 5 0 5 0 12
3J3E_8 0.07 0.07 0.09 1 2731 16 4 6 6 14
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3U4M_B - 0.78 0.73 0.84 16 1257 4 0 3 1 6
3W3S_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 29 1960 1 0 0 1 4
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4JRC_A - 0.87 0.76 1.00 13 609 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 92
Total TN 13363
Total FP 132
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 32
Total FN 84
Total Scores
MCC 0.494
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.503 ± 0.193
Sensitivity 0.523
Positive Predictive Value 0.479
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2M58_A - 0.40 0.42 0.42 5 532 8 1 6 1 7
3J3E_8 0.26 0.33 0.21 5 2718 31 6 13 12 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W3S_B 0.55 0.55 0.56 18 1957 15 4 10 1 15
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4
4JRC_A - 0.27 0.29 0.29 5 605 12 0 12 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.