CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST Multilign(20)
MCC 0.572 > 0.517
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.193 > 0.513 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.578 > 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.576 > 0.515
Total TP 133 > 122
Total TN 19981 > 19975
Total FP 131 < 139
Total FP CONTRA 40 > 39
Total FP INCONS 58 < 76
Total FP COMP 33 > 24
Total FN 97 < 108
P-value 9.26036189514e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Multilign(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Multilign(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 133
Total TN 19981
Total FP 131
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 58
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 97
Total Scores
MCC 0.572
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.193
Sensitivity 0.578
Positive Predictive Value 0.576
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.41 0.52 0.34 11 1187 22 7 14 1 10
3J3D_C 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 946 7 3 4 0 4
3J3E_8 0.07 0.07 0.09 1 2731 16 4 6 6 14
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.27 9 4728 36 11 13 12 10
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.43 0.50 0.40 12 1172 18 6 12 0 12

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 122
Total TN 19975
Total FP 139
Total FP CONTRA 39
Total FP INCONS 76
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 108
Total Scores
MCC 0.517
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.513 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.515
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.68 0.71 0.65 15 1196 9 2 6 1 6
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2720 22 8 14 0 15
3J3F_8 0.45 0.53 0.38 10 4735 30 7 9 14 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.13 0.13 0.17 3 1184 15 2 13 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.