CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST RDfolder
MCC 0.697 > 0.515
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.645 ± 0.240 > 0.491 ± 0.228
Sensitivity 0.641 > 0.455
Positive Predictive Value 0.771 > 0.603
Total TP 148 > 105
Total TN 10349 < 10367
Total FP 47 < 71
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 16
Total FP INCONS 32 < 53
Total FP COMP 3 > 2
Total FN 83 < 126
P-value 1.34193807955e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 148
Total TN 10349
Total FP 47
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 32
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 83
Total Scores
MCC 0.697
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.645 ± 0.240
Sensitivity 0.641
Positive Predictive Value 0.771
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 408 3 1 2 0 11
3J20_0 0.41 0.52 0.34 11 1187 22 7 14 1 10
3J3D_C 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 946 7 3 4 0 4
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
3W3S_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 29 1960 1 0 0 1 4
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4JRC_A - 0.87 0.76 1.00 13 609 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 105
Total TN 10367
Total FP 71
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 53
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 126
Total Scores
MCC 0.515
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.491 ± 0.228
Sensitivity 0.455
Positive Predictive Value 0.603
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
3J0L_a - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 407 4 3 1 0 11
3J20_0 0.82 0.76 0.89 16 1201 3 1 1 1 5
3J3D_C 0.76 0.79 0.75 15 948 5 3 2 0 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
3W3S_B 0.29 0.27 0.33 9 1962 18 2 16 0 24
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9
4JRC_A - 0.94 0.88 1.00 15 607 0 0 0 0 2

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.