CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.577 > 0.513
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.512 ± 0.330 > 0.487 ± 0.251
Sensitivity 0.549 > 0.429
Positive Predictive Value 0.613 < 0.624
Total TP 100 > 78
Total TN 17854 < 17892
Total FP 95 > 72
Total FP CONTRA 24 > 14
Total FP INCONS 39 > 33
Total FP COMP 32 > 25
Total FN 82 < 104
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 100
Total TN 17854
Total FP 95
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 39
Total FP COMP 32
Total FN 82
Total Scores
MCC 0.577
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.512 ± 0.330
Sensitivity 0.549
Positive Predictive Value 0.613
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
3J3E_8 0.07 0.07 0.09 1 2731 16 4 6 6 14
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.27 9 4728 36 11 13 12 10
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
3W3S_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 29 1960 1 0 0 1 4
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 78
Total TN 17892
Total FP 72
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 104
Total Scores
MCC 0.513
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.487 ± 0.251
Sensitivity 0.429
Positive Predictive Value 0.624
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 10 0 10 0 18
3J3E_8 0.18 0.20 0.18 3 2725 22 5 9 8 12
3J3F_8 0.47 0.47 0.47 9 4742 18 5 5 8 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
3W3S_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 12 1977 1 0 0 1 21
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12
4JF2_A 0.64 0.42 1.00 10 1072 0 0 0 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.