CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & RSpredict(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST RSpredict(20)
MCC 0.572 > 0.537
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.193 > 0.516 ± 0.211
Sensitivity 0.578 > 0.509
Positive Predictive Value 0.576 < 0.576
Total TP 133 > 117
Total TN 19981 < 20009
Total FP 131 > 106
Total FP CONTRA 40 > 38
Total FP INCONS 58 > 48
Total FP COMP 33 > 20
Total FN 97 < 113
P-value 2.38747296323e-06

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and RSpredict(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and RSpredict(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 133
Total TN 19981
Total FP 131
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 58
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 97
Total Scores
MCC 0.572
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.193
Sensitivity 0.578
Positive Predictive Value 0.576
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.41 0.52 0.34 11 1187 22 7 14 1 10
3J3D_C 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 946 7 3 4 0 4
3J3E_8 0.07 0.07 0.09 1 2731 16 4 6 6 14
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.27 9 4728 36 11 13 12 10
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.43 0.50 0.40 12 1172 18 6 12 0 12

^top



Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 117
Total TN 20009
Total FP 106
Total FP CONTRA 38
Total FP INCONS 48
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 113
Total Scores
MCC 0.537
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.516 ± 0.211
Sensitivity 0.509
Positive Predictive Value 0.576
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 1198 3 1 1 1 2
3J3D_C 0.82 0.84 0.80 16 948 4 3 1 0 3
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 19 5 13 1 15
3J3F_8 0.42 0.47 0.38 9 4737 26 9 6 11 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 1 0 0 3
3SD1_A 0.82 0.86 0.78 25 1501 7 5 2 0 4
4A1C_2 0.25 0.30 0.21 6 4487 30 12 11 7 14
4AOB_A 0.33 0.21 0.55 6 1426 5 1 4 0 23
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.51 0.40 0.67 6 487 3 0 3 0 9
4FRG_B 0.19 0.13 0.33 3 1193 6 1 5 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.