CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & MXScarna(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold MXScarna(20)
MCC 0.558 > 0.550
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.569 ± 0.212 > 0.539 ± 0.191
Sensitivity 0.544 > 0.519
Positive Predictive Value 0.580 < 0.591
Total TP 112 > 107
Total TN 22994 < 23006
Total FP 129 > 119
Total FP CONTRA 37 > 30
Total FP INCONS 44 = 44
Total FP COMP 48 > 45
Total FN 94 < 99
P-value 0.000344965941577

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and MXScarna(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MXScarna(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MXScarna(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and MXScarna(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MXScarna(20)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 112
Total TN 22994
Total FP 129
Total FP CONTRA 37
Total FP INCONS 44
Total FP COMP 48
Total FN 94
Total Scores
MCC 0.558
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.569 ± 0.212
Sensitivity 0.544
Positive Predictive Value 0.580
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J3D_C 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 949 4 3 1 0 4
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2722 29 12 8 9 15
3J3F_8 0.36 0.42 0.31 8 4735 32 9 9 14 11
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7

^top



Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 107
Total TN 23006
Total FP 119
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 44
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 99
Total Scores
MCC 0.550
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.191
Sensitivity 0.519
Positive Predictive Value 0.591
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.93 0.90 0.95 19 1199 1 1 0 0 2
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 0.21 0.20 0.23 3 2729 15 4 6 5 12
3J3F_8 0.48 0.53 0.43 10 4738 29 7 6 16 9
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.31 0.41 9 5352 15 3 10 2 20
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 36 8 11 17 15
4AOB_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1408 13 2 7 4 9
4ENB_A 0.29 0.13 0.67 2 469 1 0 1 0 13
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.65 0.58 0.74 14 1183 6 2 3 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.