CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold RDfolder
MCC 0.760 > 0.491
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.700 ± 0.199 > 0.489 ± 0.241
Sensitivity 0.703 > 0.443
Positive Predictive Value 0.833 > 0.566
Total TP 130 > 82
Total TN 8206 < 8217
Total FP 30 < 65
Total FP CONTRA 8 < 15
Total FP INCONS 18 < 48
Total FP COMP 4 > 2
Total FN 55 < 103
P-value 9.35568223474e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 130
Total TN 8206
Total FP 30
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 18
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 55
Total Scores
MCC 0.760
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.700 ± 0.199
Sensitivity 0.703
Positive Predictive Value 0.833
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
3J0L_a - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 402 2 0 1 1 3
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J3D_C 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 949 4 3 1 0 4
3W3S_B 0.87 0.85 0.90 28 1958 4 0 3 1 5
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ATO_G - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 218 2 1 1 0 7
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4JRC_A - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 608 0 0 0 0 3

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 82
Total TN 8217
Total FP 65
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 48
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 103
Total Scores
MCC 0.491
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.489 ± 0.241
Sensitivity 0.443
Positive Predictive Value 0.566
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
3J0L_a - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 407 4 3 1 0 11
3J20_0 0.82 0.76 0.89 16 1201 3 1 1 1 5
3J3D_C 0.76 0.79 0.75 15 948 5 3 2 0 4
3W3S_B 0.29 0.27 0.33 9 1962 18 2 16 0 24
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ATO_G - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 216 0 0 0 0 3
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9
4JRC_A - 0.94 0.88 1.00 15 607 0 0 0 0 2

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.