CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.477 > 0.390
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.439 ± 0.256 > 0.380 ± 0.216
Sensitivity 0.475 > 0.323
Positive Predictive Value 0.487 > 0.481
Total TP 75 > 51
Total TN 20838 < 20886
Total FP 126 > 85
Total FP CONTRA 30 > 16
Total FP INCONS 49 > 39
Total FP COMP 47 > 30
Total FN 83 < 107
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 75
Total TN 20838
Total FP 126
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 49
Total FP COMP 47
Total FN 83
Total Scores
MCC 0.477
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.439 ± 0.256
Sensitivity 0.475
Positive Predictive Value 0.487
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2722 29 12 8 9 15
3J3F_8 0.36 0.42 0.31 8 4735 32 9 9 14 11
3W3S_B 0.87 0.85 0.90 28 1958 4 0 3 1 5
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4JF2_A 0.57 0.50 0.67 12 1064 6 2 4 0 12

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 51
Total TN 20886
Total FP 85
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 39
Total FP COMP 30
Total FN 107
Total Scores
MCC 0.390
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.380 ± 0.216
Sensitivity 0.323
Positive Predictive Value 0.481
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 10 0 10 0 18
3J3E_8 0.18 0.20 0.18 3 2725 22 5 9 8 12
3J3F_8 0.47 0.47 0.47 9 4742 18 5 5 8 10
3W3S_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 12 1977 1 0 0 1 21
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.31 0.50 9 5356 14 2 7 5 20
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12
4JF2_A 0.64 0.42 1.00 10 1072 0 0 0 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.