CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold CRWrnafold
MCC 0.594 > 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.616 ± 0.188 > 0.510 ± 0.264
Sensitivity 0.579 > 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.622 > 0.503
Total TP 92 > 82
Total TN 10521 > 10506
Total FP 73 < 103
Total FP CONTRA 23 < 27
Total FP INCONS 33 < 54
Total FP COMP 17 < 22
Total FN 67 < 77
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and CRWrnafold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 92
Total TN 10521
Total FP 73
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 67
Total Scores
MCC 0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.616 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.579
Positive Predictive Value 0.622
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.46 0.39 0.58 7 516 5 3 2 0 11
3J0L_a - 0.53 0.55 0.55 6 400 6 3 2 1 5
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 5 4 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1256 5 0 3 2 5
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 33 9 13 11 15
4AOB_A 0.53 0.52 0.56 15 1410 13 3 9 1 14
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 82
Total TN 10506
Total FP 103
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 77
Total Scores
MCC 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.510 ± 0.264
Sensitivity 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.503
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 3 2 1 7
3SD1_A 0.63 0.66 0.61 19 1502 12 6 6 0 10
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 44 8 20 16 15
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 8 4 3 1 9
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 2 0 0 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.