CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold Multilign(20)
MCC 0.567 > 0.517
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.177 > 0.513 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.596 > 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.550 > 0.515
Total TP 137 > 122
Total TN 19963 < 19975
Total FP 161 > 139
Total FP CONTRA 46 > 39
Total FP INCONS 66 < 76
Total FP COMP 49 > 24
Total FN 93 < 108
P-value 2.52220743227e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Multilign(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Multilign(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 137
Total TN 19963
Total FP 161
Total FP CONTRA 46
Total FP INCONS 66
Total FP COMP 49
Total FN 93
Total Scores
MCC 0.567
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.177
Sensitivity 0.596
Positive Predictive Value 0.550
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.53 0.57 0.50 12 1195 13 3 9 1 9
3J3D_C 0.71 0.79 0.65 15 945 8 3 5 0 4
3J3E_8 0.12 0.13 0.11 2 2724 32 5 11 16 13
3J3F_8 0.35 0.47 0.26 9 4726 44 13 13 18 10
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 5 4 0 9
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 33 9 13 11 15
4AOB_A 0.53 0.52 0.56 15 1410 13 3 9 1 14
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4
4FRG_B 0.73 0.71 0.77 17 1180 5 3 2 0 7

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 122
Total TN 19975
Total FP 139
Total FP CONTRA 39
Total FP INCONS 76
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 108
Total Scores
MCC 0.517
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.513 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.515
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.68 0.71 0.65 15 1196 9 2 6 1 6
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2720 22 8 14 0 15
3J3F_8 0.45 0.53 0.38 10 4735 30 7 9 14 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.13 0.13 0.17 3 1184 15 2 13 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.