CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold Afold
MCC 0.647 > 0.632
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.672 ± 0.155 > 0.613 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.649 = 0.649
Positive Predictive Value 0.655 > 0.627
Total TP 133 = 133
Total TN 13010 > 13001
Total FP 81 < 103
Total FP CONTRA 17 < 19
Total FP INCONS 53 < 60
Total FP COMP 11 < 24
Total FN 72 = 72
P-value 1.99684630116e-06

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Afold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Afold).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 133
Total TN 13010
Total FP 81
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 53
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 72
Total Scores
MCC 0.647
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.672 ± 0.155
Sensitivity 0.649
Positive Predictive Value 0.655
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
2M58_A - 0.60 0.58 0.64 7 533 4 1 3 0 5
3ADB_C - 0.84 0.82 0.87 27 1788 4 0 4 0 6
3NKB_B - 0.46 0.42 0.53 8 720 7 0 7 0 11
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W3S_B 0.48 0.45 0.52 15 1960 15 1 13 1 18
4ATO_G - 0.88 1.00 0.78 7 211 2 2 0 0 0
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 133
Total TN 13001
Total FP 103
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 60
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 72
Total Scores
MCC 0.632
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.613 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.649
Positive Predictive Value 0.627
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2M58_A - 0.40 0.42 0.42 5 532 8 1 6 1 7
3ADB_C - 0.85 0.85 0.85 28 1786 6 0 5 1 5
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W3S_B 0.55 0.55 0.56 18 1957 15 4 10 1 15
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 6 5 0 1 4
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.