CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold CRWrnafold
MCC 0.624 > 0.563
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.627 ± 0.276 > 0.556 ± 0.288
Sensitivity 0.619 > 0.554
Positive Predictive Value 0.647 > 0.592
Total TP 86 > 77
Total TN 6020 < 6023
Total FP 49 < 59
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 19
Total FP INCONS 34 = 34
Total FP COMP 2 < 6
Total FN 53 < 62
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and CRWrnafold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 86
Total TN 6020
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 34
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 53
Total Scores
MCC 0.624
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.627 ± 0.276
Sensitivity 0.619
Positive Predictive Value 0.647
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3J0L_a - 0.17 0.18 0.20 2 401 9 3 5 1 9
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 77
Total TN 6023
Total FP 59
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 34
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 62
Total Scores
MCC 0.563
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.288
Sensitivity 0.554
Positive Predictive Value 0.592
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 3 2 1 7
3SD1_A 0.63 0.66 0.61 19 1502 12 6 6 0 10
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 8 4 3 1 9
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 2 0 0 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.