CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & Murlet(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold Murlet(20)
MCC 0.752 > 0.674
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.773 ± 0.172 > 0.626 ± 0.182
Sensitivity 0.734 > 0.581
Positive Predictive Value 0.778 < 0.792
Total TP 168 > 133
Total TN 16613 < 16661
Total FP 62 > 42
Total FP CONTRA 19 > 11
Total FP INCONS 29 > 24
Total FP COMP 14 > 7
Total FN 61 < 96
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Murlet(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Murlet(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Murlet(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Murlet(20)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 168
Total TN 16613
Total FP 62
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 61
Total Scores
MCC 0.752
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.773 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.734
Positive Predictive Value 0.778
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3

^top



Performance of Murlet(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 133
Total TN 16661
Total FP 42
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 24
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 96
Total Scores
MCC 0.674
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.626 ± 0.182
Sensitivity 0.581
Positive Predictive Value 0.792
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.65 0.62 0.68 13 1200 6 1 5 0 8
3O58_3 0.37 0.32 0.44 7 4748 13 4 5 4 15
3PDR_A 0.84 0.76 0.93 38 4799 3 1 2 0 12
3RKF_A 0.81 0.67 1.00 16 850 0 0 0 0 8
3SD1_A 0.82 0.83 0.83 24 1504 5 4 1 0 5
4AOB_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 22 1415 3 0 0 3 7
4ENB_A 0.51 0.27 1.00 4 468 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.19 0.17 0.25 4 1186 12 1 11 0 20

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.