CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.671 > 0.136
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.702 ± 0.188 > 0.049 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.631 > 0.025
Positive Predictive Value 0.727 < 0.750
Total TP 149 > 6
Total TN 11385 < 11582
Total FP 59 > 2
Total FP CONTRA 18 > 0
Total FP INCONS 38 > 2
Total FP COMP 3 > 0
Total FN 87 < 230
P-value 1.04628667909e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 149
Total TN 11385
Total FP 59
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 87
Total Scores
MCC 0.671
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.702 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.631
Positive Predictive Value 0.727
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3W3S_B 0.48 0.45 0.52 15 1960 15 1 13 1 18
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3
4FRN_A 0.23 0.18 0.31 5 1832 11 7 4 0 23

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 6
Total TN 11582
Total FP 2
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 2
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 230
Total Scores
MCC 0.136
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.049 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.025
Positive Predictive Value 0.750
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.33 0.75 6 520 2 0 2 0 12
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1219 0 0 0 0 21
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1989 0 0 0 0 33
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1848 0 0 0 0 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.