CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold TurboFold(20)
MCC 0.780 > 0.777
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.811 ± 0.191 > 0.780 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.752 > 0.713
Positive Predictive Value 0.819 < 0.855
Total TP 118 > 112
Total TN 7081 < 7094
Total FP 28 > 21
Total FP CONTRA 9 > 6
Total FP INCONS 17 > 13
Total FP COMP 2 = 2
Total FN 39 < 45
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and TurboFold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and TurboFold(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and TurboFold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and TurboFold(20)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 118
Total TN 7081
Total FP 28
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 17
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 39
Total Scores
MCC 0.780
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.811 ± 0.191
Sensitivity 0.752
Positive Predictive Value 0.819
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3

^top



Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 112
Total TN 7094
Total FP 21
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 45
Total Scores
MCC 0.777
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.780 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.713
Positive Predictive Value 0.855
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 1 5 1 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.