CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold Vsfold4
MCC 0.693 > 0.598
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.687 ± 0.118 > 0.559 ± 0.160
Sensitivity 0.681 > 0.577
Positive Predictive Value 0.716 > 0.632
Total TP 277 > 235
Total TN 25988 < 26003
Total FP 134 < 160
Total FP CONTRA 34 < 38
Total FP INCONS 76 < 99
Total FP COMP 24 > 23
Total FN 130 < 172
P-value 2.66715895098e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Vsfold4).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 277
Total TN 25988
Total FP 134
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 76
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 130
Total Scores
MCC 0.693
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.687 ± 0.118
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.716
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.85 0.87 0.83 20 2000 12 4 0 8 3
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
2M58_A - 0.60 0.58 0.64 7 533 4 1 3 0 5
3ADB_C - 0.84 0.82 0.87 27 1788 4 0 4 0 6
3J0L_a - 0.17 0.18 0.20 2 401 9 3 5 1 9
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3NKB_B - 0.46 0.42 0.53 8 720 7 0 7 0 11
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W3S_B 0.48 0.45 0.52 15 1960 15 1 13 1 18
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ATO_G - 0.88 1.00 0.78 7 211 2 2 0 0 0
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 235
Total TN 26003
Total FP 160
Total FP CONTRA 38
Total FP INCONS 99
Total FP COMP 23
Total FN 172
Total Scores
MCC 0.598
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.559 ± 0.160
Sensitivity 0.577
Positive Predictive Value 0.632
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.84 0.83 0.86 19 2002 9 2 1 6 4
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
2M58_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 538 6 0 6 0 12
3ADB_C - 0.95 0.91 1.00 30 1789 0 0 0 0 3
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 4 1 1 7
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3O58_3 0.12 0.14 0.11 3 4737 35 8 16 11 19
3PDR_A 0.69 0.64 0.74 32 4797 13 3 8 2 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.23 0.24 0.24 7 1504 22 5 17 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W3S_B 0.74 0.70 0.79 23 1960 7 1 5 1 10
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 5 5 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.