CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

FAQ

Metric	Fold		NanoFolder
MCC	0.433	>	0.406
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.384 ± 0.190	<	0.450 ± 0.163
Sensitivity	0.464	<	0.516
Positive Predictive Value	0.417	>	0.333
Total TP	116	<	129
Total TN	20903	>	20794
Total FP	207	<	311
Total FP CONTRA	47	<	98
Total FP INCONS	115	<	160
Total FP COMP	45	<	53
Total FN	134	>	121
P-value	0.00091553769281

Comparison of performance of Fold and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and NanoFolder).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and NanoFolder).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Fold and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and NanoFolder).

Total Scores
MCC	0.433
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.384 ± 0.190
Sensitivity	0.464
Positive Predictive Value	0.417
Nr of predictions	13

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	513	15	3	12	0	18
2M58_A	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	529	15	0	15	0	12
3J3D_C	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.47	0.53	0.43	10	945	13	5	8	0	9
3J3E_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	2719	34	5	18	11	15
3J3F_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.32	0.42	0.25	8	4729	41	12	12	17	11
3U4M_B	-	0.58	0.59	0.59	13	1254	9	2	7	0	9
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.91	0.97	30	1958	2	0	1	1	3
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.19	0.25	0.15	5	4482	43	11	18	14	15
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.60	0.59	0.63	17	1410	11	4	6	1	12
4ATO_G	-	0.38	0.43	0.38	3	212	5	5	0	0	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.36	0.33	0.42	5	484	8	0	7	1	10
4JF2_A	preQ1-II links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.79	1.00	19	1063	0	0	0	0	5
4JRC_A	-	0.34	0.35	0.35	6	605	11	0	11	0	11

Total Scores
MCC	0.406
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.450 ± 0.163
Sensitivity	0.516
Positive Predictive Value	0.333
Nr of predictions	13

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.54	0.61	0.50	11	506	11	1	10	0	7
2M58_A	-	0.45	0.58	0.37	7	525	13	6	6	1	5
3J3D_C	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.95	0.62	18	939	11	9	2	0	1
3J3E_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	2707	47	11	24	12	15
3J3F_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.30	0.47	0.19	9	4714	57	21	17	19	10
3U4M_B	-	0.77	0.91	0.67	20	1246	12	6	4	2	2
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.18	0.21	0.18	7	1949	34	2	31	1	26
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	4469	61	18	29	14	20
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.39	0.41	0.39	12	1406	20	4	15	1	17
4ATO_G	-	0.72	1.00	0.54	7	207	6	6	0	0	0
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.73	0.61	11	478	9	2	5	2	4
4JF2_A	preQ1-II links to Rfam database...	0.55	0.67	0.47	16	1048	19	9	9	1	8
4JRC_A	-	0.56	0.65	0.50	11	600	11	3	8	0	6

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.