CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Fold & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Fold RDfolder
MCC 0.575 > 0.510
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.497 ± 0.162 < 0.505 ± 0.177
Sensitivity 0.572 > 0.455
Positive Predictive Value 0.595 > 0.592
Total TP 166 > 132
Total TN 13036 < 13092
Total FP 119 > 93
Total FP CONTRA 32 > 19
Total FP INCONS 81 > 72
Total FP COMP 6 > 2
Total FN 124 < 158
P-value 3.415269236e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Fold and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Fold and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 166
Total TN 13036
Total FP 119
Total FP CONTRA 32
Total FP INCONS 81
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 124
Total Scores
MCC 0.575
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.497 ± 0.162
Sensitivity 0.572
Positive Predictive Value 0.595
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3ADB_C - 0.86 0.85 0.88 28 1787 4 0 4 0 5
3J0L_a - 0.15 0.18 0.17 2 399 11 4 6 1 9
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J3D_C 0.47 0.53 0.43 10 945 13 5 8 0 9
3NKB_B - 0.41 0.42 0.42 8 716 11 4 7 0 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3W3S_B 0.94 0.91 0.97 30 1958 2 0 1 1 3
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 5 5 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10
4JRC_A - 0.34 0.35 0.35 6 605 11 0 11 0 11

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 132
Total TN 13092
Total FP 93
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 72
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 158
Total Scores
MCC 0.510
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.505 ± 0.177
Sensitivity 0.455
Positive Predictive Value 0.592
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
3ADB_C - 0.48 0.45 0.54 15 1791 13 1 12 0 18
3J0L_a - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 407 4 3 1 0 11
3J20_0 0.82 0.76 0.89 16 1201 3 1 1 1 5
3J3D_C 0.76 0.79 0.75 15 948 5 3 2 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.43 0.42 0.47 8 718 9 2 7 0 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
3W3S_B 0.29 0.27 0.33 9 1962 18 2 16 0 24
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ATO_G - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 216 0 0 0 0 3
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9
4JRC_A - 0.94 0.88 1.00 15 607 0 0 0 0 2

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.