CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for HotKnots & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric HotKnots CRWrnafold
MCC 0.618 > 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.651 ± 0.220 > 0.510 ± 0.264
Sensitivity 0.654 > 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.594 > 0.503
Total TP 104 > 82
Total TN 10494 < 10506
Total FP 87 < 103
Total FP CONTRA 29 > 27
Total FP INCONS 42 < 54
Total FP COMP 16 < 22
Total FN 55 < 77
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of HotKnots and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and CRWrnafold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for HotKnots and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 104
Total TN 10494
Total FP 87
Total FP CONTRA 29
Total FP INCONS 42
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 55
Total Scores
MCC 0.618
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.651 ± 0.220
Sensitivity 0.654
Positive Predictive Value 0.594
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 0 5 0 7
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.64 0.50 7 397 8 5 2 1 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 12 16 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 82
Total TN 10506
Total FP 103
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 77
Total Scores
MCC 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.510 ± 0.264
Sensitivity 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.503
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 3 2 1 7
3SD1_A 0.63 0.66 0.61 19 1502 12 6 6 0 10
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 44 8 20 16 15
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 8 4 3 1 9
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 2 0 0 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.