CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot Afold
MCC 0.442 > 0.394
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.565 ± 0.214 > 0.477 ± 0.156
Sensitivity 0.384 < 0.429
Positive Predictive Value 0.510 > 0.363
Total TP 203 < 227
Total TN 434729 > 434501
Total FP 230 < 475
Total FP CONTRA 43 < 107
Total FP INCONS 152 < 292
Total FP COMP 35 < 76
Total FN 326 > 302
P-value 1.62930789924e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Afold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Afold).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 203
Total TN 434729
Total FP 230
Total FP CONTRA 43
Total FP INCONS 152
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 326
Total Scores
MCC 0.442
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.565 ± 0.214
Sensitivity 0.384
Positive Predictive Value 0.510
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 1 4 0 12
2M58_A - 0.71 0.58 0.88 7 536 1 1 0 0 5
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2723 25 5 14 6 15
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3U4M_B - 0.91 0.91 0.91 20 1254 3 2 0 1 2
3W3S_B 0.94 0.91 0.97 30 1958 2 0 1 1 3
3ZEX_B - 0.33 0.27 0.40 95 421115 160 26 116 18 251
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4ATO_G - 0.49 0.57 0.44 4 211 6 0 5 1 3
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4JRC_A - 0.45 0.29 0.71 5 615 2 0 2 0 12

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 227
Total TN 434501
Total FP 475
Total FP CONTRA 107
Total FP INCONS 292
Total FP COMP 76
Total FN 302
Total Scores
MCC 0.394
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.477 ± 0.156
Sensitivity 0.429
Positive Predictive Value 0.363
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2M58_A - 0.40 0.42 0.42 5 532 8 1 6 1 7
3J3E_8 0.26 0.33 0.21 5 2718 31 6 13 12 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W3S_B 0.55 0.55 0.56 18 1957 15 4 10 1 15
3ZEX_B - 0.34 0.38 0.31 132 420926 337 77 217 43 214
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 6 5 0 1 4
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4
4JRC_A - 0.27 0.29 0.29 5 605 12 0 12 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.