CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PknotsRG - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & PknotsRG [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot PknotsRG
MCC 0.518 > 0.492
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.591 ± 0.118 < 0.596 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.468 < 0.531
Positive Predictive Value 0.574 > 0.458
Total TP 378 < 429
Total TN 456478 > 456199
Total FP 339 < 604
Total FP CONTRA 73 < 151
Total FP INCONS 207 < 357
Total FP COMP 59 < 96
Total FN 430 > 379
P-value 5.41251352392e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and PknotsRG. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and PknotsRG).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and PknotsRG).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and PknotsRG. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and PknotsRG).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 378
Total TN 456478
Total FP 339
Total FP CONTRA 73
Total FP INCONS 207
Total FP COMP 59
Total FN 430
Total Scores
MCC 0.518
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.591 ± 0.118
Sensitivity 0.468
Positive Predictive Value 0.574
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 1 4 0 12
2M58_A - 0.71 0.58 0.88 7 536 1 1 0 0 5
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.18 0.18 2 400 10 3 6 1 9
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J3D_C 0.52 0.53 0.53 10 949 9 3 6 0 9
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2723 25 5 14 6 15
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.28 9 4729 40 11 12 17 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.91 0.91 0.91 20 1254 3 2 0 1 2
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.94 0.91 0.97 30 1958 2 0 1 1 3
3ZEX_B - 0.33 0.27 0.40 95 421115 160 26 116 18 251
3ZEX_C 0.51 0.34 0.77 10 5361 7 1 2 4 19
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ATO_G - 0.49 0.57 0.44 4 211 6 0 5 1 3
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.79 0.71 0.87 20 1825 3 1 2 0 8
4JF2_A 0.96 0.96 0.96 23 1058 1 1 0 0 1
4JRC_A - 0.45 0.29 0.71 5 615 2 0 2 0 12

^top



Performance of PknotsRG - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 429
Total TN 456199
Total FP 604
Total FP CONTRA 151
Total FP INCONS 357
Total FP COMP 96
Total FN 379
Total Scores
MCC 0.492
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.596 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.531
Positive Predictive Value 0.458
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.66 0.61 0.73 11 513 4 2 2 0 7
2M58_A - 0.96 1.00 0.92 12 531 1 1 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.18 0.22 2 402 8 3 4 1 9
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J3D_C 0.63 0.68 0.59 13 946 9 3 6 0 6
3J3E_8 0.26 0.33 0.21 5 2718 30 6 13 11 10
3J3F_8 0.32 0.42 0.24 8 4728 40 12 13 15 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.64 0.64 0.66 21 1957 12 4 7 1 12
3ZEX_B - 0.36 0.40 0.33 140 420927 323 78 207 38 206
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.26 10 5336 44 5 23 16 19
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 43 11 20 12 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ATO_G - 0.88 1.00 0.78 7 211 2 2 0 0 0
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15
4FRN_A 0.59 0.57 0.62 16 1822 10 2 8 0 12
4JF2_A 0.88 0.92 0.85 22 1056 4 4 0 0 2
4JRC_A - 0.34 0.35 0.35 6 605 11 0 11 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.