CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot ProbKnot
MCC 0.600 > 0.508
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.598 ± 0.114 > 0.500 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.560 > 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.644 > 0.488
Total TP 683 > 647
Total TN 878444 > 878179
Total FP 498 < 841
Total FP CONTRA 90 < 197
Total FP INCONS 287 < 481
Total FP COMP 121 < 163
Total FN 537 < 573
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and ProbKnot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and ProbKnot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 683
Total TN 878444
Total FP 498
Total FP CONTRA 90
Total FP INCONS 287
Total FP COMP 121
Total FN 537
Total Scores
MCC 0.600
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.598 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.560
Positive Predictive Value 0.644
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 1 4 0 12
2M58_A - 0.71 0.58 0.88 7 536 1 1 0 0 5
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.18 0.18 2 400 10 3 6 1 9
3J20_2 0.75 0.74 0.76 305 421966 159 17 80 62 107
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J3D_C 0.52 0.53 0.53 10 949 9 3 6 0 9
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2723 25 5 14 6 15
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.28 9 4729 40 11 12 17 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.91 0.91 0.91 20 1254 3 2 0 1 2
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.94 0.91 0.97 30 1958 2 0 1 1 3
3ZEX_B - 0.33 0.27 0.40 95 421115 160 26 116 18 251
3ZEX_C 0.51 0.34 0.77 10 5361 7 1 2 4 19
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ATO_G - 0.49 0.57 0.44 4 211 6 0 5 1 3
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.79 0.71 0.87 20 1825 3 1 2 0 8
4JF2_A 0.96 0.96 0.96 23 1058 1 1 0 0 1
4JRC_A - 0.45 0.29 0.71 5 615 2 0 2 0 12

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 647
Total TN 878179
Total FP 841
Total FP CONTRA 197
Total FP INCONS 481
Total FP COMP 163
Total FN 573
Total Scores
MCC 0.508
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.500 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.488
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2M58_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 529 15 0 15 0 12
3J0L_a - 0.60 0.64 0.58 7 399 6 4 1 1 4
3J20_2 0.61 0.61 0.60 253 421947 227 32 136 59 159
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J3D_C 0.46 0.53 0.42 10 944 14 6 8 0 9
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2718 37 6 18 13 15
3J3F_8 0.39 0.47 0.33 9 4734 38 9 9 20 10
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.59 0.59 13 1254 9 2 7 0 9
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1957 1 0 0 1 1
3ZEX_B - 0.35 0.38 0.33 133 420946 320 82 191 47 213
3ZEX_C 0.48 0.52 0.45 15 5341 22 4 14 4 14
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 5 5 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7
4FRG_B 0.38 0.38 0.41 9 1180 13 6 7 0 15
4FRN_A 0.49 0.46 0.54 13 1824 11 6 5 0 15
4JF2_A 0.91 0.92 0.92 22 1058 2 2 0 0 2
4JRC_A - 0.28 0.29 0.31 5 606 11 0 11 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.