CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

FAQ

Metric	MXScarna(seed)		CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC	0.597	>	0.569
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.550 ± 0.145	<	0.562 ± 0.192
Sensitivity	0.541	<	0.570
Positive Predictive Value	0.669	>	0.579
Total TP	170	<	179
Total TN	24437	>	24382
Total FP	123	<	164
Total FP CONTRA	26	<	48
Total FP INCONS	58	<	82
Total FP COMP	39	>	34
Total FN	144	>	135
P-value	5.12463712669e-08

Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

Total Scores
MCC	0.597
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.550 ± 0.145
Sensitivity	0.541
Positive Predictive Value	0.669
Nr of predictions	14

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	518	12	0	10	2	18
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.90	0.86	0.95	18	1200	1	1	0	0	3
3J3E_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.23	0.20	0.27	3	2731	14	3	5	6	12
3J3F_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.47	0.50	9	4743	21	5	4	12	10
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.75	1.00	18	848	0	0	0	0	6
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.76	0.73	22	1503	9	4	4	1	7
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.70	0.79	23	1960	7	0	6	1	10
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.40	0.50	8	4500	20	4	4	12	12
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.69	0.74	20	1410	10	2	5	3	9
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.54	0.40	0.75	6	464	2	0	2	0	9
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.40	0.60	6	486	4	1	3	0	9
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.49	0.42	0.59	10	1185	8	2	5	1	14
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.68	0.73	19	1822	7	3	4	0	9
4JF2_A	preQ1-II links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.33	0.53	8	1067	8	1	6	1	16

Total Scores
MCC	0.569
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.562 ± 0.192
Sensitivity	0.570
Positive Predictive Value	0.579
Nr of predictions	14

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	517	11	0	11	0	18
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.52	0.34	11	1187	22	7	14	1	10
3J3E_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.07	0.07	0.09	1	2731	16	4	6	6	14
3J3F_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.36	0.47	0.27	9	4728	36	11	13	12	10
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.75	1.00	18	848	0	0	0	0	6
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.66	0.90	19	1512	2	1	1	0	10
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.88	1.00	29	1960	1	0	0	1	4
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.24	0.25	0.24	5	4495	29	8	8	13	15
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.72	1.00	21	1416	1	0	0	1	8
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	461	0	0	0	0	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	485	0	0	0	0	4
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.43	0.50	0.40	12	1172	18	6	12	0	12
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.37	0.46	0.32	13	1807	28	11	17	0	15
4JF2_A	preQ1-II links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.79	1.00	19	1063	0	0	0	0	5

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.