CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) Cylofold
MCC 0.687 > 0.677
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.628 ± 0.161 < 0.691 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.640 < 0.646
Positive Predictive Value 0.746 > 0.718
Total TP 197 < 199
Total TN 20930 > 20917
Total FP 90 < 93
Total FP CONTRA 22 < 28
Total FP INCONS 45 < 50
Total FP COMP 23 > 15
Total FN 111 > 109
P-value 0.000544433348394

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 197
Total TN 20930
Total FP 90
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 23
Total FN 111
Total Scores
MCC 0.687
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.628 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.640
Positive Predictive Value 0.746
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 12 0 10 2 18
3J20_0 0.90 0.86 0.95 18 1200 1 1 0 0 3
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 20 5 3 12 11
3PDR_A 0.87 0.88 0.86 44 4789 10 4 3 3 6
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 4 4 1 7
3W3S_B 0.74 0.70 0.79 23 1960 7 0 6 1 10
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 10 2 5 3 9
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 1 3 0 9
4FRG_B 0.49 0.42 0.59 10 1185 8 2 5 1 14
4FRN_A 0.70 0.68 0.73 19 1822 7 3 4 0 9

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 199
Total TN 20917
Total FP 93
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 50
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 109
Total Scores
MCC 0.677
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.691 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.646
Positive Predictive Value 0.718
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3W3S_B 0.48 0.45 0.52 15 1960 15 1 13 1 18
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3
4FRN_A 0.23 0.18 0.31 5 1832 11 7 4 0 23

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.