CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) RDfolder
MCC 0.763 > 0.584
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.732 ± 0.140 > 0.574 ± 0.186
Sensitivity 0.701 > 0.531
Positive Predictive Value 0.841 > 0.660
Total TP 248 > 188
Total TN 16254 < 16264
Total FP 61 < 100
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 18
Total FP INCONS 34 < 79
Total FP COMP 14 > 3
Total FN 106 < 166
P-value 2.16131455263e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 248
Total TN 16254
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 34
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 106
Total Scores
MCC 0.763
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.732 ± 0.140
Sensitivity 0.701
Positive Predictive Value 0.841
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 12 0 10 2 18
2ZZN_D 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 964 0 0 0 0 2
3A2K_C 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1088 0 0 0 0 2
3A3A_A 0.84 0.77 0.92 23 1475 4 0 2 2 7
3GX2_A 0.83 0.82 0.85 23 1422 7 2 2 3 5
3IVN_B 0.69 0.57 0.87 13 888 2 2 0 0 10
3J20_0 0.90 0.86 0.95 18 1200 1 1 0 0 3
3JYV_7 0.95 0.90 1.00 18 1093 2 0 0 2 2
3LA5_A 0.82 0.72 0.95 18 935 1 1 0 0 7
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 4 4 1 7
3W3S_B 0.74 0.70 0.79 23 1960 7 0 6 1 10
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 10 2 5 3 9
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 1 3 0 9

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 188
Total TN 16264
Total FP 100
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 79
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 166
Total Scores
MCC 0.584
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.186
Sensitivity 0.531
Positive Predictive Value 0.660
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
2ZZN_D 0.93 0.95 0.91 21 961 2 2 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3A3A_A 0.59 0.50 0.71 15 1479 6 0 6 0 15
3GX2_A 0.60 0.57 0.64 16 1424 10 2 7 1 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_0 0.82 0.76 0.89 16 1201 3 1 1 1 5
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1091 20 4 16 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
3W3S_B 0.29 0.27 0.33 9 1962 18 2 16 0 24
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.