CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) UNAFold
MCC 0.739 > 0.580
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.663 ± 0.091 > 0.589 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.698 > 0.604
Positive Predictive Value 0.784 > 0.560
Total TP 845 > 731
Total TN 520900 > 520673
Total FP 421 < 737
Total FP CONTRA 93 < 171
Total FP INCONS 140 < 403
Total FP COMP 188 > 163
Total FN 366 < 480
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 845
Total TN 520900
Total FP 421
Total FP CONTRA 93
Total FP INCONS 140
Total FP COMP 188
Total FN 366
Total Scores
MCC 0.739
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.663 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.698
Positive Predictive Value 0.784
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 12 0 10 2 18
2ZZN_D 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 964 0 0 0 0 2
3A2K_C 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1088 0 0 0 0 2
3A3A_A 0.84 0.77 0.92 23 1475 4 0 2 2 7
3GX2_A 0.83 0.82 0.85 23 1422 7 2 2 3 5
3IVN_B 0.69 0.57 0.87 13 888 2 2 0 0 10
3IYQ_A 0.44 0.47 0.41 24 22382 49 21 13 15 27
3IZ4_A 0.73 0.64 0.82 61 25462 22 12 1 9 34
3J20_2 0.83 0.82 0.84 337 421969 147 14 48 85 75
3J20_0 0.90 0.86 0.95 18 1200 1 1 0 0 3
3J3E_8 0.23 0.20 0.27 3 2731 14 3 5 6 12
3J3F_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 9 4743 21 5 4 12 10
3JYV_7 0.95 0.90 1.00 18 1093 2 0 0 2 2
3LA5_A 0.82 0.72 0.95 18 935 1 1 0 0 7
3NPB_A 0.76 0.70 0.84 26 2247 10 2 3 5 11
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 20 5 3 12 11
3PDR_A 0.87 0.88 0.86 44 4789 10 4 3 3 6
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 4 4 1 7
3W1K_J 0.92 0.90 0.93 28 1648 3 1 1 1 3
3W3S_B 0.74 0.70 0.79 23 1960 7 0 6 1 10
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.31 0.50 9 5356 21 3 6 12 20
4A1C_2 0.45 0.40 0.50 8 4500 20 4 4 12 12
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 10 2 5 3 9
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 1 3 0 9
4FRG_B 0.49 0.42 0.59 10 1185 8 2 5 1 14
4FRN_A 0.70 0.68 0.73 19 1822 7 3 4 0 9
4JF2_A 0.41 0.33 0.53 8 1067 8 1 6 1 16

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 731
Total TN 520673
Total FP 737
Total FP CONTRA 171
Total FP INCONS 403
Total FP COMP 163
Total FN 480
Total Scores
MCC 0.580
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.589 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.604
Positive Predictive Value 0.560
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2ZZN_D 0.93 0.95 0.91 21 961 2 2 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.47 0.50 0.46 11 1084 13 3 10 0 11
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.81 0.79 0.85 22 1423 5 2 2 1 6
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IYQ_A 0.23 0.33 0.17 17 22339 96 46 38 12 34
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.60 0.57 57 25436 53 12 31 10 38
3J20_2 0.57 0.58 0.55 240 421931 250 36 161 53 172
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J3E_8 0.15 0.20 0.13 3 2718 32 6 15 11 12
3J3F_8 0.32 0.42 0.25 8 4729 44 12 12 20 11
3JYV_7 0.24 0.25 0.25 5 1091 16 7 8 1 15
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.85 0.78 0.94 29 2247 6 0 2 4 8
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 34 5 15 14 11
3PDR_A 0.93 0.92 0.94 46 4791 5 1 2 2 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.61 0.61 0.63 20 1957 13 4 8 1 13
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.26 10 5336 43 5 23 15 19
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 11 17 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15
4FRN_A 0.48 0.46 0.52 13 1823 12 2 10 0 15
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.