CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) Vsfold5
MCC 0.687 > 0.511
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.657 ± 0.097 > 0.538 ± 0.146
Sensitivity 0.637 > 0.517
Positive Predictive Value 0.746 > 0.513
Total TP 471 > 382
Total TN 91927 > 91814
Total FP 250 < 438
Total FP CONTRA 75 < 125
Total FP INCONS 85 < 237
Total FP COMP 90 > 76
Total FN 268 < 357
P-value 5.06544643719e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 471
Total TN 91927
Total FP 250
Total FP CONTRA 75
Total FP INCONS 85
Total FP COMP 90
Total FN 268
Total Scores
MCC 0.687
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.657 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.637
Positive Predictive Value 0.746
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 12 0 10 2 18
2ZZN_D 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 964 0 0 0 0 2
3A2K_C 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1088 0 0 0 0 2
3A3A_A 0.84 0.77 0.92 23 1475 4 0 2 2 7
3GX2_A 0.83 0.82 0.85 23 1422 7 2 2 3 5
3IVN_B 0.69 0.57 0.87 13 888 2 2 0 0 10
3IYQ_A 0.44 0.47 0.41 24 22382 49 21 13 15 27
3IZ4_A 0.73 0.64 0.82 61 25462 22 12 1 9 34
3J20_0 0.90 0.86 0.95 18 1200 1 1 0 0 3
3J3E_8 0.23 0.20 0.27 3 2731 14 3 5 6 12
3J3F_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 9 4743 21 5 4 12 10
3JYV_7 0.95 0.90 1.00 18 1093 2 0 0 2 2
3LA5_A 0.82 0.72 0.95 18 935 1 1 0 0 7
3NPB_A 0.76 0.70 0.84 26 2247 10 2 3 5 11
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 20 5 3 12 11
3PDR_A 0.87 0.88 0.86 44 4789 10 4 3 3 6
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 4 4 1 7
3W3S_B 0.74 0.70 0.79 23 1960 7 0 6 1 10
4A1C_2 0.45 0.40 0.50 8 4500 20 4 4 12 12
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 10 2 5 3 9
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 1 3 0 9
4FRG_B 0.49 0.42 0.59 10 1185 8 2 5 1 14
4FRN_A 0.70 0.68 0.73 19 1822 7 3 4 0 9
4JF2_A 0.41 0.33 0.53 8 1067 8 1 6 1 16

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 382
Total TN 91814
Total FP 438
Total FP CONTRA 125
Total FP INCONS 237
Total FP COMP 76
Total FN 357
Total Scores
MCC 0.511
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.538 ± 0.146
Sensitivity 0.517
Positive Predictive Value 0.513
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
2ZZN_D 0.95 0.95 0.95 21 962 1 1 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1088 0 0 0 0 2
3A3A_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 1473 0 0 0 0 3
3GX2_A 0.61 0.57 0.67 16 1425 9 0 8 1 12
3IVN_B 0.88 0.78 1.00 18 885 0 0 0 0 5
3IYQ_A 0.30 0.37 0.24 19 22361 71 36 24 11 32
3IZ4_A 0.31 0.31 0.33 29 25448 65 14 45 6 66
3J20_0 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 1198 6 3 2 1 5
3J3E_8 0.10 0.13 0.08 2 2718 31 10 12 9 13
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.27 9 4728 38 13 11 14 10
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1092 19 4 15 0 20
3LA5_A -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 938 16 0 16 0 25
3NPB_A 0.62 0.54 0.71 20 2250 10 1 7 2 17
3O58_3 0.51 0.59 0.45 13 4735 28 11 5 12 9
3PDR_A 0.69 0.64 0.74 32 4797 13 3 8 2 18
3RKF_A 0.90 0.92 0.88 22 841 3 3 0 0 2
3SD1_A 0.13 0.14 0.15 4 1507 22 5 17 0 25
3W3S_B 0.83 0.85 0.82 28 1955 7 2 4 1 5
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.28 8 4487 37 8 13 16 12
4AOB_A 0.21 0.21 0.25 6 1413 19 2 16 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10
4FRN_A 0.15 0.14 0.17 4 1825 19 3 16 0 24
4JF2_A 0.96 1.00 0.92 24 1056 2 2 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.