CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Mastr(20) & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Mastr(20) IPknot
MCC 0.544 > 0.536
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.404 ± 0.249 < 0.541 ± 0.166
Sensitivity 0.363 < 0.525
Positive Predictive Value 0.825 > 0.557
Total TP 94 < 136
Total TN 25472 > 25342
Total FP 22 < 145
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 37
Total FP INCONS 11 < 71
Total FP COMP 2 < 37
Total FN 165 > 123
P-value 0.0268470467617

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Mastr(20) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and IPknot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and IPknot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Mastr(20) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and IPknot).

^top





Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 94
Total TN 25472
Total FP 22
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 11
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 165
Total Scores
MCC 0.544
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.404 ± 0.249
Sensitivity 0.363
Positive Predictive Value 0.825
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3F_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4761 0 0 0 0 19
3RKF_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 849 0 0 0 0 7
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5374 0 0 0 0 29
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4AOB_A 0.42 0.34 0.53 10 1418 10 1 8 1 19
4ENB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 3 469 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 136
Total TN 25342
Total FP 145
Total FP CONTRA 37
Total FP INCONS 71
Total FP COMP 37
Total FN 123
Total Scores
MCC 0.536
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.541 ± 0.166
Sensitivity 0.525
Positive Predictive Value 0.557
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J3D_C 0.52 0.53 0.53 10 949 9 3 6 0 9
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2723 25 5 14 6 15
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.28 9 4729 40 11 12 17 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.51 0.34 0.77 10 5361 7 1 2 4 19
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.