CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Mastr(20) & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Mastr(20) Multilign(20)
MCC 0.577 > 0.517
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.441 ± 0.261 < 0.513 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.409 < 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.825 > 0.515
Total TP 94 < 122
Total TN 20098 > 19975
Total FP 22 < 139
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 39
Total FP INCONS 11 < 76
Total FP COMP 2 < 24
Total FN 136 > 108
P-value 1.47941000302e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Mastr(20) and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Multilign(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Multilign(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Mastr(20) and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 94
Total TN 20098
Total FP 22
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 11
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 136
Total Scores
MCC 0.577
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.441 ± 0.261
Sensitivity 0.409
Positive Predictive Value 0.825
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3F_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4761 0 0 0 0 19
3RKF_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 849 0 0 0 0 7
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4AOB_A 0.42 0.34 0.53 10 1418 10 1 8 1 19
4ENB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 3 469 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 122
Total TN 19975
Total FP 139
Total FP CONTRA 39
Total FP INCONS 76
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 108
Total Scores
MCC 0.517
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.513 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.515
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.68 0.71 0.65 15 1196 9 2 6 1 6
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2720 22 8 14 0 15
3J3F_8 0.45 0.53 0.38 10 4735 30 7 9 14 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.13 0.13 0.17 3 1184 15 2 13 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.