CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Mastr(20) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Mastr(20) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.544 > 0.073
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.404 ± 0.249 > 0.036 ± 0.043
Sensitivity 0.363 > 0.019
Positive Predictive Value 0.825 > 0.294
Total TP 94 > 5
Total TN 25472 < 25569
Total FP 22 < 77
Total FP CONTRA 9 > 0
Total FP INCONS 11 < 12
Total FP COMP 2 < 65
Total FN 165 < 254
P-value 2.06323189071e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Mastr(20) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Mastr(20) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 94
Total TN 25472
Total FP 22
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 11
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 165
Total Scores
MCC 0.544
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.404 ± 0.249
Sensitivity 0.363
Positive Predictive Value 0.825
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3F_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4761 0 0 0 0 19
3RKF_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 849 0 0 0 0 7
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5374 0 0 0 0 29
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4AOB_A 0.42 0.34 0.53 10 1418 10 1 8 1 19
4ENB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 3 469 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 5
Total TN 25569
Total FP 77
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 12
Total FP COMP 65
Total FN 254
Total Scores
MCC 0.073
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.036 ± 0.043
Sensitivity 0.019
Positive Predictive Value 0.294
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1219 0 0 0 0 21
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 968 0 0 0 0 19
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 6 0 0 6 15
3J3F_8 0.19 0.11 0.33 2 4755 24 0 4 20 17
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3ZEX_C 0.15 0.07 0.33 2 5368 24 0 4 20 27
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.