CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(20) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(20) Fold
MCC 0.517 > 0.435
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.513 ± 0.207 > 0.423 ± 0.171
Sensitivity 0.530 > 0.470
Positive Predictive Value 0.515 > 0.415
Total TP 122 > 108
Total TN 19975 > 19952
Total FP 139 < 198
Total FP CONTRA 39 < 51
Total FP INCONS 76 < 101
Total FP COMP 24 < 46
Total FN 108 < 122
P-value 1.32883086441e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(20) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and Fold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and Fold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(20) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and Fold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 122
Total TN 19975
Total FP 139
Total FP CONTRA 39
Total FP INCONS 76
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 108
Total Scores
MCC 0.517
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.513 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.515
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.68 0.71 0.65 15 1196 9 2 6 1 6
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2720 22 8 14 0 15
3J3F_8 0.45 0.53 0.38 10 4735 30 7 9 14 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.13 0.13 0.17 3 1184 15 2 13 0 21

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 108
Total TN 19952
Total FP 198
Total FP CONTRA 51
Total FP INCONS 101
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 122
Total Scores
MCC 0.435
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.423 ± 0.171
Sensitivity 0.470
Positive Predictive Value 0.415
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J3D_C 0.47 0.53 0.43 10 945 13 5 8 0 9
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 34 5 18 11 15
3J3F_8 0.32 0.42 0.25 8 4729 41 12 12 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10
4FRG_B 0.22 0.25 0.23 6 1176 20 7 13 0 18

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.