CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & ContextFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) ContextFold
MCC 0.628 > 0.588
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.554 ± 0.317 > 0.549 ± 0.239
Sensitivity 0.575 > 0.565
Positive Predictive Value 0.696 > 0.622
Total TP 119 > 117
Total TN 16507 > 16490
Total FP 55 < 92
Total FP CONTRA 17 < 27
Total FP INCONS 35 < 44
Total FP COMP 3 < 21
Total FN 88 < 90
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and ContextFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and ContextFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and ContextFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and ContextFold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 119
Total TN 16507
Total FP 55
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 88
Total Scores
MCC 0.628
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.554 ± 0.317
Sensitivity 0.575
Positive Predictive Value 0.696
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 2 10 0 18
3J3E_8 0.19 0.20 0.19 3 2726 13 8 5 0 12
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.92 0.88 0.97 29 1959 2 0 1 1 4
3ZEX_C 0.50 0.45 0.57 13 5351 11 3 7 1 16
4AOB_A 0.73 0.66 0.83 19 1414 5 1 3 1 10
4FRN_A 0.27 0.21 0.35 6 1831 11 2 9 0 22
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top



Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 117
Total TN 16490
Total FP 92
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 44
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 90
Total Scores
MCC 0.588
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.549 ± 0.239
Sensitivity 0.565
Positive Predictive Value 0.622
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2722 29 12 8 9 15
3W1K_J 0.90 0.87 0.93 27 1649 2 1 1 0 4
3W3S_B 0.87 0.85 0.90 28 1958 4 0 3 1 5
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4FRN_A 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 1824 13 6 7 0 17
4JF2_A 0.57 0.50 0.67 12 1064 6 2 4 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.