CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) Fold
MCC 0.658 > 0.598
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.601 ± 0.253 > 0.568 ± 0.274
Sensitivity 0.608 < 0.612
Positive Predictive Value 0.721 > 0.596
Total TP 158 < 159
Total TN 18858 > 18810
Total FP 64 < 133
Total FP CONTRA 21 < 33
Total FP INCONS 40 < 75
Total FP COMP 3 < 25
Total FN 102 > 101
P-value 9.45186852942e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Fold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Fold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 158
Total TN 18858
Total FP 64
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 40
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 102
Total Scores
MCC 0.658
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.601 ± 0.253
Sensitivity 0.608
Positive Predictive Value 0.721
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 2 10 0 18
3J3E_8 0.19 0.20 0.19 3 2726 13 8 5 0 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.66 0.68 19 1505 9 4 5 0 10
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.92 0.88 0.97 29 1959 2 0 1 1 4
3ZEX_C 0.50 0.45 0.57 13 5351 11 3 7 1 16
4AOB_A 0.73 0.66 0.83 19 1414 5 1 3 1 10
4FRN_A 0.27 0.21 0.35 6 1831 11 2 9 0 22
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 159
Total TN 18810
Total FP 133
Total FP CONTRA 33
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 101
Total Scores
MCC 0.598
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.568 ± 0.274
Sensitivity 0.612
Positive Predictive Value 0.596
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 34 5 18 11 15
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.94 0.91 0.97 30 1958 2 0 1 1 3
3ZEX_C 0.28 0.34 0.23 10 5330 46 9 25 12 19
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4FRN_A 0.46 0.46 0.46 13 1820 15 7 8 0 15
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.