CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) MCFold
MCC 0.528 > 0.423
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.484 ± 0.332 > 0.434 ± 0.273
Sensitivity 0.479 > 0.455
Positive Predictive Value 0.593 > 0.406
Total TP 80 > 76
Total TN 13838 > 13786
Total FP 56 < 129
Total FP CONTRA 19 < 21
Total FP INCONS 36 < 90
Total FP COMP 1 < 18
Total FN 87 < 91
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and MCFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 13838
Total FP 56
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 36
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 87
Total Scores
MCC 0.528
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.484 ± 0.332
Sensitivity 0.479
Positive Predictive Value 0.593
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 2 10 0 18
3J3E_8 0.19 0.20 0.19 3 2726 13 8 5 0 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.66 0.68 19 1505 9 4 5 0 10
3ZEX_C 0.50 0.45 0.57 13 5351 11 3 7 1 16
4FRN_A 0.27 0.21 0.35 6 1831 11 2 9 0 22
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 76
Total TN 13786
Total FP 129
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 90
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 91
Total Scores
MCC 0.423
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.434 ± 0.273
Sensitivity 0.455
Positive Predictive Value 0.406
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 511 10 0 9 1 10
3J3E_8 0.15 0.20 0.12 3 2716 36 11 12 13 12
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.27 10 5337 28 6 21 1 19
4FRN_A 0.09 0.11 0.10 3 1818 28 2 25 1 25
4JF2_A 0.74 0.75 0.75 18 1058 7 1 5 1 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.