CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) RNASLOpt
MCC 0.628 > 0.536
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.554 ± 0.317 > 0.503 ± 0.303
Sensitivity 0.575 > 0.507
Positive Predictive Value 0.696 > 0.577
Total TP 119 > 105
Total TN 16507 > 16496
Total FP 55 < 104
Total FP CONTRA 17 < 24
Total FP INCONS 35 < 53
Total FP COMP 3 < 27
Total FN 88 < 102
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNASLOpt).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 119
Total TN 16507
Total FP 55
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 88
Total Scores
MCC 0.628
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.554 ± 0.317
Sensitivity 0.575
Positive Predictive Value 0.696
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 2 10 0 18
3J3E_8 0.19 0.20 0.19 3 2726 13 8 5 0 12
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.92 0.88 0.97 29 1959 2 0 1 1 4
3ZEX_C 0.50 0.45 0.57 13 5351 11 3 7 1 16
4AOB_A 0.73 0.66 0.83 19 1414 5 1 3 1 10
4FRN_A 0.27 0.21 0.35 6 1831 11 2 9 0 22
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 105
Total TN 16496
Total FP 104
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 53
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 102
Total Scores
MCC 0.536
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.503 ± 0.303
Sensitivity 0.507
Positive Predictive Value 0.577
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.48 0.39 0.64 7 517 4 0 4 0 11
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 30 6 12 12 15
3W1K_J 0.93 0.90 0.97 28 1649 1 1 0 0 3
3W3S_B 0.90 0.85 0.97 28 1960 2 0 1 1 5
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.34 0.31 10 5342 36 8 14 14 19
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4FRN_A 0.19 0.18 0.22 5 1825 18 6 12 0 23
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.