CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) RNAwolf
MCC 0.658 > 0.452
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.601 ± 0.253 > 0.453 ± 0.248
Sensitivity 0.608 > 0.458
Positive Predictive Value 0.721 > 0.461
Total TP 158 > 119
Total TN 18858 > 18819
Total FP 64 < 156
Total FP CONTRA 21 < 33
Total FP INCONS 40 < 106
Total FP COMP 3 < 17
Total FN 102 < 141
P-value 1.50834591464e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 158
Total TN 18858
Total FP 64
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 40
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 102
Total Scores
MCC 0.658
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.601 ± 0.253
Sensitivity 0.608
Positive Predictive Value 0.721
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 2 10 0 18
3J3E_8 0.19 0.20 0.19 3 2726 13 8 5 0 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.66 0.68 19 1505 9 4 5 0 10
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.92 0.88 0.97 29 1959 2 0 1 1 4
3ZEX_C 0.50 0.45 0.57 13 5351 11 3 7 1 16
4AOB_A 0.73 0.66 0.83 19 1414 5 1 3 1 10
4FRN_A 0.27 0.21 0.35 6 1831 11 2 9 0 22
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 119
Total TN 18819
Total FP 156
Total FP CONTRA 33
Total FP INCONS 106
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 141
Total Scores
MCC 0.452
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.453 ± 0.248
Sensitivity 0.458
Positive Predictive Value 0.461
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 37 6 17 14 15
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3W1K_J 0.81 0.77 0.86 24 1650 5 0 4 1 7
3W3S_B 0.70 0.70 0.72 23 1957 10 0 9 1 10
3ZEX_C 0.08 0.10 0.07 3 5328 43 18 25 0 26
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1828 20 1 19 0 28
4JF2_A 0.72 0.67 0.80 16 1062 4 4 0 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.