CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) TurboFold(20)
MCC 0.625 > 0.619
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.598 ± 0.338 < 0.610 ± 0.300
Sensitivity 0.587 < 0.595
Positive Predictive Value 0.673 > 0.652
Total TP 74 < 75
Total TN 11842 > 11837
Total FP 38 < 56
Total FP CONTRA 16 > 12
Total FP INCONS 20 < 28
Total FP COMP 2 < 16
Total FN 52 > 51
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and TurboFold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and TurboFold(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and TurboFold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and TurboFold(20)).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 74
Total TN 11842
Total FP 38
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 20
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 52
Total Scores
MCC 0.625
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.598 ± 0.338
Sensitivity 0.587
Positive Predictive Value 0.673
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.19 0.20 0.19 3 2726 13 8 5 0 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.66 0.68 19 1505 9 4 5 0 10
3ZEX_C 0.50 0.45 0.57 13 5351 11 3 7 1 16
4AOB_A 0.73 0.66 0.83 19 1414 5 1 3 1 10

^top



Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 75
Total TN 11837
Total FP 56
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 28
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 51
Total Scores
MCC 0.619
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.610 ± 0.300
Sensitivity 0.595
Positive Predictive Value 0.652
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.27 0.33 0.23 5 2720 28 6 11 11 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.45 0.54 13 5350 15 2 9 4 16
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.