CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) UNAFold
MCC 0.658 > 0.588
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.601 ± 0.253 > 0.564 ± 0.242
Sensitivity 0.608 > 0.592
Positive Predictive Value 0.721 > 0.595
Total TP 158 > 154
Total TN 18858 > 18818
Total FP 64 < 133
Total FP CONTRA 21 < 29
Total FP INCONS 40 < 76
Total FP COMP 3 < 28
Total FN 102 < 106
P-value 1.05690340753e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and UNAFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 158
Total TN 18858
Total FP 64
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 40
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 102
Total Scores
MCC 0.658
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.601 ± 0.253
Sensitivity 0.608
Positive Predictive Value 0.721
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 2 10 0 18
3J3E_8 0.19 0.20 0.19 3 2726 13 8 5 0 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.66 0.68 19 1505 9 4 5 0 10
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.92 0.88 0.97 29 1959 2 0 1 1 4
3ZEX_C 0.50 0.45 0.57 13 5351 11 3 7 1 16
4AOB_A 0.73 0.66 0.83 19 1414 5 1 3 1 10
4FRN_A 0.27 0.21 0.35 6 1831 11 2 9 0 22
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 154
Total TN 18818
Total FP 133
Total FP CONTRA 29
Total FP INCONS 76
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 106
Total Scores
MCC 0.588
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.564 ± 0.242
Sensitivity 0.592
Positive Predictive Value 0.595
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J3E_8 0.15 0.20 0.13 3 2718 32 6 15 11 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.61 0.61 0.63 20 1957 13 4 8 1 13
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.26 10 5336 43 5 23 15 19
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4FRN_A 0.48 0.46 0.52 13 1823 12 2 10 0 15
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.