CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & RNAsubopt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) RNAsubopt
MCC 0.625 > 0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.627 ± 0.101 > 0.551 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.530 < 0.596
Positive Predictive Value 0.744 > 0.542
Total TP 308 < 346
Total TN 68115 > 67891
Total FP 142 < 378
Total FP CONTRA 28 < 100
Total FP INCONS 78 < 192
Total FP COMP 36 < 86
Total FN 273 > 235
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and RNAsubopt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and RNAsubopt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and RNAsubopt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and RNAsubopt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and RNAsubopt).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 308
Total TN 68115
Total FP 142
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 78
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 273
Total Scores
MCC 0.625
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.627 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.744
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.88 0.86 0.90 19 1087 2 0 2 0 3
3GX2_A 0.73 0.54 1.00 15 1434 1 0 0 1 13
3IVN_B 0.80 0.65 1.00 15 888 0 0 0 0 8
3IZ4_A 0.46 0.33 0.66 31 25489 22 3 13 6 64
3J20_0 0.65 0.62 0.68 13 1200 6 1 5 0 8
3J3D_C 0.84 0.84 0.84 16 949 3 3 0 0 3
3J3E_8 0.35 0.33 0.38 5 2729 13 2 6 5 10
3J3F_8 0.54 0.53 0.56 10 4743 13 2 6 5 9
3JYV_7 0.84 0.80 0.89 16 1093 4 0 2 2 4
3LA5_A 0.80 0.64 1.00 16 938 0 0 0 0 9
3NPB_A 0.65 0.43 1.00 16 2262 2 0 0 2 21
3O58_3 0.37 0.32 0.44 7 4748 13 4 5 4 15
3PDR_A 0.84 0.76 0.93 38 4799 3 1 2 0 12
3RKF_A 0.81 0.67 1.00 16 850 0 0 0 0 8
3SD1_A 0.82 0.83 0.83 24 1504 5 4 1 0 5
3ZEX_C 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 5351 16 2 10 4 18
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.20 5 4491 24 5 15 4 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 22 1415 3 0 0 3 7
4ENB_A 0.51 0.27 1.00 4 468 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.19 0.17 0.25 4 1186 12 1 11 0 20

^top



Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 346
Total TN 67891
Total FP 378
Total FP CONTRA 100
Total FP INCONS 192
Total FP COMP 86
Total FN 235
Total Scores
MCC 0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.551 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.596
Positive Predictive Value 0.542
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.47 0.50 0.46 11 1084 13 3 10 0 11
3GX2_A 0.53 0.54 0.54 15 1421 14 4 9 1 13
3IVN_B 0.88 0.78 1.00 18 885 0 0 0 0 5
3IZ4_A 0.56 0.60 0.53 57 25429 54 26 24 4 38
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 2 11 1 9
3J3D_C 0.65 0.74 0.58 14 944 10 5 5 0 5
3J3E_8 0.25 0.33 0.20 5 2717 32 7 13 12 10
3J3F_8 0.35 0.47 0.26 9 4726 42 13 13 16 10
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1090 21 4 17 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.84 0.78 0.91 29 2246 8 0 3 5 8
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 35 6 15 14 11
3PDR_A 0.90 0.90 0.90 45 4790 7 2 3 2 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.26 10 5336 43 5 23 15 19
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4481 43 13 17 13 15
4AOB_A 0.62 0.62 0.64 18 1409 11 4 6 1 11
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 7 0 7 0 10
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.