CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.583 > 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.569 ± 0.174 < 0.574 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.523 < 0.554
Positive Predictive Value 0.658 > 0.560
Total TP 102 < 108
Total TN 22042 > 22004
Total FP 74 < 129
Total FP CONTRA 15 < 31
Total FP INCONS 38 < 54
Total FP COMP 21 < 44
Total FN 93 > 87
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 102
Total TN 22042
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 93
Total Scores
MCC 0.583
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.569 ± 0.174
Sensitivity 0.523
Positive Predictive Value 0.658
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.35 0.33 0.38 5 2729 13 2 6 5 10
3J3F_8 0.54 0.53 0.56 10 4743 13 2 6 5 9
3RKF_A 0.81 0.67 1.00 16 850 0 0 0 0 8
3SD1_A 0.82 0.83 0.83 24 1504 5 4 1 0 5
3ZEX_C 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 5351 16 2 10 4 18
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.20 5 4491 24 5 15 4 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 22 1415 3 0 0 3 7
4ENB_A 0.51 0.27 1.00 4 468 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 108
Total TN 22004
Total FP 129
Total FP CONTRA 31
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 87
Total Scores
MCC 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.554
Positive Predictive Value 0.560
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.27 0.33 0.23 5 2720 28 6 11 11 10
3J3F_8 0.42 0.53 0.34 10 4732 35 9 10 16 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.45 0.54 13 5350 15 2 9 4 16
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.