CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(seed) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(seed) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.493 > 0.214
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.491 ± 0.109 > 0.112 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.320 > 0.074
Positive Predictive Value 0.769 > 0.634
Total TP 113 > 26
Total TN 30377 < 30483
Total FP 39 < 80
Total FP CONTRA 3 > 1
Total FP INCONS 31 > 14
Total FP COMP 5 < 65
Total FN 240 < 327
P-value 1.61358433984e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(seed) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(seed) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 113
Total TN 30377
Total FP 39
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 31
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 240
Total Scores
MCC 0.493
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.491 ± 0.109
Sensitivity 0.320
Positive Predictive Value 0.769
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
3J3E_8 0.36 0.13 1.00 2 2740 2 0 0 2 13
3J3F_8 0.61 0.37 1.00 7 4754 0 0 0 0 12
3RKF_A 0.62 0.50 0.80 12 851 3 1 2 0 12
3SD1_A 0.56 0.38 0.85 11 1520 2 0 2 0 18
3W1K_J 0.47 0.26 0.89 8 1669 1 0 1 0 23
3W3S_B 0.45 0.27 0.75 9 1977 3 0 3 0 24
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.24 1.00 7 5367 0 0 0 0 22
4A1C_2 0.59 0.35 1.00 7 4509 0 0 0 0 13
4AOB_A 0.69 0.48 1.00 14 1423 1 0 0 1 15
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9
4FRG_B 0.17 0.13 0.25 3 1190 9 0 9 0 21
4FRN_A 0.66 0.50 0.88 14 1832 2 1 1 0 14
4JF2_A 0.47 0.29 0.78 7 1073 4 1 1 2 17

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 26
Total TN 30483
Total FP 80
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 65
Total FN 327
Total Scores
MCC 0.214
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.112 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.074
Positive Predictive Value 0.634
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.33 0.75 6 520 2 0 2 0 12
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 6 0 0 6 15
3J3F_8 0.19 0.11 0.33 2 4755 24 0 4 20 17
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3W1K_J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1678 0 0 0 0 31
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1989 0 0 0 0 33
3ZEX_C 0.15 0.07 0.33 2 5368 24 0 4 20 27
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1848 0 0 0 0 28
4JF2_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 15 1066 1 1 0 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.