CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

FAQ

Metric	NanoFolder		MCFold
MCC	0.444	>	0.375
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.481 ± 0.188	>	0.371 ± 0.148
Sensitivity	0.585	>	0.441
Positive Predictive Value	0.348	>	0.332
Total TP	110	>	83
Total TN	17439	<	17505
Total FP	257	>	221
Total FP CONTRA	92	>	47
Total FP INCONS	114	<	120
Total FP COMP	51	<	54
Total FN	78	<	105
P-value	1.18011954625e-08

Comparison of performance of NanoFolder and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and MCFold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and MCFold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for NanoFolder and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and MCFold).

Total Scores
MCC	0.444
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.481 ± 0.188
Sensitivity	0.585
Positive Predictive Value	0.348
Nr of predictions	11

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.54	0.61	0.50	11	506	11	1	10	0	7
2M58_A	-	0.45	0.58	0.37	7	525	13	6	6	1	5
3J3D_C	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.95	0.62	18	939	11	9	2	0	1
3J3E_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	2707	47	11	24	12	15
3J3F_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.30	0.47	0.19	9	4714	57	21	17	19	10
3U4M_B	-	0.77	0.91	0.67	20	1246	12	6	4	2	2
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	4469	61	18	29	14	20
4ATO_G	-	0.72	1.00	0.54	7	207	6	6	0	0	0
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.73	0.61	11	478	9	2	5	2	4
4JF2_A	preQ1-II links to Rfam database...	0.55	0.67	0.47	16	1048	19	9	9	1	8
4JRC_A	-	0.56	0.65	0.50	11	600	11	3	8	0	6

Total Scores
MCC	0.375
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.371 ± 0.148
Sensitivity	0.441
Positive Predictive Value	0.332
Nr of predictions	11

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.44	0.44	0.47	8	511	10	0	9	1	10
2M58_A	-	0.22	0.25	0.23	3	531	13	1	9	3	9
3J3D_C	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.54	0.63	0.48	12	943	13	4	9	0	7
3J3E_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.15	0.20	0.12	3	2716	36	11	12	13	12
3J3F_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.14	0.21	0.10	4	4720	51	17	20	14	15
3U4M_B	-	0.74	0.77	0.71	17	1252	10	1	6	3	5
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.18	0.25	0.14	5	4480	45	12	19	14	15
4ATO_G	-	0.36	0.43	0.33	3	211	8	0	6	2	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.34	0.33	0.38	5	483	11	0	8	3	10
4JF2_A	preQ1-II links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.75	0.75	18	1058	7	1	5	1	6
4JRC_A	-	0.24	0.29	0.23	5	600	17	0	17	0	12

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.