CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for NanoFolder & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric NanoFolder RDfolder
MCC 0.483 > 0.470
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.543 ± 0.189 > 0.515 ± 0.306
Sensitivity 0.558 > 0.435
Positive Predictive Value 0.440 < 0.531
Total TP 77 > 60
Total TN 6085 < 6147
Total FP 102 > 54
Total FP CONTRA 27 > 11
Total FP INCONS 71 > 42
Total FP COMP 4 > 1
Total FN 61 < 78
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of NanoFolder and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for NanoFolder and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 77
Total TN 6085
Total FP 102
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 71
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 61
Total Scores
MCC 0.483
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.543 ± 0.189
Sensitivity 0.558
Positive Predictive Value 0.440
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.54 0.61 0.50 11 506 11 1 10 0 7
3J3D_C 0.76 0.95 0.62 18 939 11 9 2 0 1
3W3S_B 0.18 0.21 0.18 7 1949 34 2 31 1 26
4AOB_A 0.39 0.41 0.39 12 1406 20 4 15 1 17
4ATO_G - 0.72 1.00 0.54 7 207 6 6 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.66 0.73 0.61 11 478 9 2 5 2 4
4JRC_A - 0.56 0.65 0.50 11 600 11 3 8 0 6

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 60
Total TN 6147
Total FP 54
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 42
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 78
Total Scores
MCC 0.470
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.515 ± 0.306
Sensitivity 0.435
Positive Predictive Value 0.531
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
3J3D_C 0.76 0.79 0.75 15 948 5 3 2 0 4
3W3S_B 0.29 0.27 0.33 9 1962 18 2 16 0 24
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ATO_G - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 216 0 0 0 0 3
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9
4JRC_A - 0.94 0.88 1.00 15 607 0 0 0 0 2

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.