CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & Contrafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) Contrafold
MCC 0.622 > 0.492
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.196 > 0.523 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.597 > 0.519
Positive Predictive Value 0.654 > 0.476
Total TP 123 > 107
Total TN 22999 > 22962
Total FP 94 < 173
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 43
Total FP INCONS 51 < 75
Total FP COMP 29 < 55
Total FN 83 < 99
P-value 9.74569091494e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Contrafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Contrafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Contrafold).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 123
Total TN 22999
Total FP 94
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 83
Total Scores
MCC 0.622
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.196
Sensitivity 0.597
Positive Predictive Value 0.654
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J3D_C 0.87 0.89 0.85 17 948 3 3 0 0 2
3J3E_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 7 2728 11 2 5 4 8
3J3F_8 0.34 0.37 0.32 7 4739 24 5 10 9 12
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.24 0.29 7 5350 20 1 16 3 22
4A1C_2 0.25 0.25 0.25 5 4496 25 2 13 10 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.68 0.53 0.89 8 463 1 0 1 0 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7
4FRG_B 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 1181 2 0 1 1 4

^top



Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 107
Total TN 22962
Total FP 173
Total FP CONTRA 43
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 55
Total FN 99
Total Scores
MCC 0.492
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.523 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.519
Positive Predictive Value 0.476
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.53 0.57 0.50 12 1195 13 3 9 1 9
3J3D_C 0.71 0.79 0.65 15 945 8 3 5 0 4
3J3E_8 0.12 0.13 0.11 2 2724 32 5 11 16 13
3J3F_8 0.35 0.47 0.26 9 4726 44 13 13 18 10
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.34 0.37 10 5347 23 4 13 6 19
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 33 9 13 11 15
4AOB_A 0.53 0.52 0.56 15 1410 13 3 9 1 14
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4
4FRG_B 0.73 0.71 0.77 17 1180 5 3 2 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.