CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) Cylofold
MCC 0.833 > 0.772
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.801 ± 0.181 < 0.811 ± 0.302
Sensitivity 0.769 > 0.750
Positive Predictive Value 0.909 > 0.804
Total TP 80 > 78
Total TN 4738 > 4729
Total FP 11 < 21
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 7
Total FP INCONS 7 < 12
Total FP COMP 3 > 2
Total FN 24 < 26
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 4738
Total FP 11
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 7
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 24
Total Scores
MCC 0.833
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.801 ± 0.181
Sensitivity 0.769
Positive Predictive Value 0.909
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.68 0.53 0.89 8 463 1 0 1 0 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7
4FRG_B 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 1181 2 0 1 1 4

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 78
Total TN 4729
Total FP 21
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 12
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 26
Total Scores
MCC 0.772
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.811 ± 0.302
Sensitivity 0.750
Positive Predictive Value 0.804
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.