CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) IPknot
MCC 0.622 > 0.470
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.196 > 0.484 ± 0.176
Sensitivity 0.597 > 0.466
Positive Predictive Value 0.654 > 0.482
Total TP 123 > 96
Total TN 22999 > 22988
Total FP 94 < 140
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 37
Total FP INCONS 51 < 66
Total FP COMP 29 < 37
Total FN 83 < 110
P-value 9.9460272886e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and IPknot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and IPknot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and IPknot).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 123
Total TN 22999
Total FP 94
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 83
Total Scores
MCC 0.622
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.196
Sensitivity 0.597
Positive Predictive Value 0.654
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J3D_C 0.87 0.89 0.85 17 948 3 3 0 0 2
3J3E_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 7 2728 11 2 5 4 8
3J3F_8 0.34 0.37 0.32 7 4739 24 5 10 9 12
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.24 0.29 7 5350 20 1 16 3 22
4A1C_2 0.25 0.25 0.25 5 4496 25 2 13 10 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.68 0.53 0.89 8 463 1 0 1 0 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7
4FRG_B 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 1181 2 0 1 1 4

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 96
Total TN 22988
Total FP 140
Total FP CONTRA 37
Total FP INCONS 66
Total FP COMP 37
Total FN 110
Total Scores
MCC 0.470
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.484 ± 0.176
Sensitivity 0.466
Positive Predictive Value 0.482
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J3D_C 0.52 0.53 0.53 10 949 9 3 6 0 9
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2723 25 5 14 6 15
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.28 9 4729 40 11 12 17 10
3ZEX_C 0.51 0.34 0.77 10 5361 7 1 2 4 19
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.