CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) MCFold
MCC 0.581 > 0.352
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.593 ± 0.212 > 0.382 ± 0.178
Sensitivity 0.559 > 0.418
Positive Predictive Value 0.611 > 0.307
Total TP 99 > 74
Total TN 21588 > 21509
Total FP 90 < 216
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 56
Total FP INCONS 49 < 111
Total FP COMP 27 < 49
Total FN 78 < 103
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 99
Total TN 21588
Total FP 90
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 49
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 78
Total Scores
MCC 0.581
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.593 ± 0.212
Sensitivity 0.559
Positive Predictive Value 0.611
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J3D_C 0.87 0.89 0.85 17 948 3 3 0 0 2
3J3E_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 7 2728 11 2 5 4 8
3J3F_8 0.34 0.37 0.32 7 4739 24 5 10 9 12
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.24 0.29 7 5350 20 1 16 3 22
4A1C_2 0.25 0.25 0.25 5 4496 25 2 13 10 15
4ENB_A 0.68 0.53 0.89 8 463 1 0 1 0 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7
4FRG_B 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 1181 2 0 1 1 4

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 74
Total TN 21509
Total FP 216
Total FP CONTRA 56
Total FP INCONS 111
Total FP COMP 49
Total FN 103
Total Scores
MCC 0.352
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.382 ± 0.178
Sensitivity 0.418
Positive Predictive Value 0.307
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.66 0.71 0.63 15 1195 11 3 6 2 6
3J3D_C 0.54 0.63 0.48 12 943 13 4 9 0 7
3J3E_8 0.15 0.20 0.12 3 2716 36 11 12 13 12
3J3F_8 0.14 0.21 0.10 4 4720 51 17 20 14 15
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.27 10 5337 28 6 21 1 19
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 45 12 19 14 15
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10
4FRG_B 0.35 0.38 0.35 9 1176 17 3 14 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.