Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of RNASLOpt
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(20) |
|
RNASLOpt |
| MCC |
0.622 |
>
|
0.480 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.620
±
0.196
|
>
|
0.514
±
0.210
|
| Sensitivity |
0.597 |
>
|
0.500 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.654 |
>
|
0.470 |
| Total TP |
123 |
>
|
103 |
| Total TN |
22999 |
>
|
22968 |
| Total FP |
94 |
<
|
171 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
14 |
<
|
50 |
| Total FP INCONS |
51 |
<
|
66 |
| Total FP COMP |
29 |
<
|
55 |
| Total FN |
83 |
<
|
103 |
| P-value |
1.47941000302e-08 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and RNASLOpt).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and RNASLOpt).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and RNASLOpt).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
123 |
| Total TN |
22999 |
| Total FP |
94 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
14 |
| Total FP INCONS |
51 |
| Total FP COMP |
29 |
| Total FN |
83 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.622 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.620
±
0.196
|
| Sensitivity |
0.597 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.654 |
| Nr of predictions |
10 |
Performance of RNASLOpt
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
103 |
| Total TN |
22968 |
| Total FP |
171 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
50 |
| Total FP INCONS |
66 |
| Total FP COMP |
55 |
| Total FN |
103 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.480 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.514
±
0.210
|
| Sensitivity |
0.500 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.470 |
| Nr of predictions |
10 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|